adamschneider wrote:What, you mean like this?romann wrote:If there's just one or two they may add to experience, but I can understand when it's just too many.
Interesting Cairn!
Re: Interesting Cairn!
Re: Interesting Cairn!
That beats the ones I thought about by a dozen (or two)
adamschneider wrote:What, you mean like this?romann wrote:If there's just one or two they may add to experience, but I can understand when it's just too many.
- adamschneider
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:02 pm
- Location: SE Portland
- Contact:
Re: Interesting Cairn!
And those are just the ones I fit into the frame!romann wrote:That beats the ones I thought about by a dozen (or two)
(FYI, that was at Hanakapi'ai Beach, in case anyone feels the urge to do some kicking.)
Re: Interesting Cairn!
We've had some artistic efforts posted here, but by far the reason for constructing cairns is to mark a non-trail route. So knocking over your own cairn would be pointless. Even for the artists among us, I'm guessing that they want people to see their art.TJ_T wrote:I'm fine with people building them. Just knock them over before you leave. Leave no trace, know what I mean?
Wilderness in part means no human structures, with exceptions for some historic buildings. So a cairn a structure? Is a trail sign a structure? Some wilderness advocates, including some rangers, want less signage in wilderness. I guess part of this is how we define wilderness and how wild we really want it to be.
Re: Interesting Cairn!
Signs and cairns marking a route are good. I advocate for them, even in Wilderness.drm wrote:We've had some artistic efforts posted here, but by far the reason for constructing cairns is to mark a non-trail route. So knocking over your own cairn would be pointless. Even for the artists among us, I'm guessing that they want people to see their art.TJ_T wrote:I'm fine with people building them. Just knock them over before you leave. Leave no trace, know what I mean?
Wilderness in part means no human structures, with exceptions for some historic buildings. So a cairn a structure? Is a trail sign a structure? Some wilderness advocates, including some rangers, want less signage in wilderness. I guess part of this is how we define wilderness and how wild we really want it to be.
Artsy cairns are what they are. I don't mind them. Some are cool.
Thankfully, artsy cairns are temporary. This is mainly why I don't mind them. They won't last the test of time.
Temporary art... Something that nitwit from San Diego simply didn't grasp
Re: Interesting Cairn!
This is my perspective as well. Go ahead and kick over the arty ones if you feel the need. I likely won't. Just be sure that what you are kicking over is for art and not for navigation.-Q- wrote:Signs and cairns marking a route are good. I advocate for them, even in Wilderness.
Artsy cairns are what they are. I don't mind them. Some are cool.
Thankfully, artsy cairns are temporary. This is mainly why I don't mind them. They won't last the test of time.
Temporary art... Something that nitwit from San Diego simply didn't grasp
Also, try not to kick over anything that may have been placed before you were born. These are the only ones I consider to be untouchable and irreplaceable.
Re: Interesting Cairn!
A much more subdued (& IMHO sensible) attitude to Cairns here from both sides compared to the same debate on the Facebook Portland Hikers Site, that normally ends up getting down right nasty!
Re: Interesting Cairn!
How do you know when I was born?5th wrote:Also, try not to kick over anything that may have been placed before you were born. These are the only ones I consider to be untouchable and irreplaceable.
(Emphasis added.)drm wrote:Wilderness in part means no human structures, with exceptions for some historic buildings. So a cairn a structure? Is a trail sign a structure? Some wilderness advocates, including some rangers, want less signage in wilderness. I guess part of this is how we define wilderness and how wild we really want it to be.
I agree. My view is that the most important purpose of Wilderness (capital 'W') is for humans' experience, enlightenment, and enjoyment. So I am vehemently opposed to any management system that tries to keep us out. Problem is, we're all different and need different buttons pushed to stimulate our enlightenment and enjoyment. I hate anything that busts my wilderness bubble---even seeing distant roads and civilization from the top of a peak or pass kind of sullies the experience for me---so I tend to want to nuke all goofball, er, artistic cairns.
Navigational cairns? I can go either way. If they're really needed to facilitate people experiencing the wilderness, okay. If not, which I think is usually the case, those deserve the nuclear boot as well.
Re: Interesting Cairn!
Depends entirely on where it is.Webfoot wrote:Having never seen one this fancy in person I would like to slap anyone who would kick this over: