Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

General discussions on hiking in Oregon and the Pacific Northwest
Post Reply
User avatar
Markh752
Posts: 120
Joined: March 18th, 2013, 9:21 pm

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by Markh752 » February 8th, 2016, 10:22 pm

Koda wrote:
aiwetir wrote:The guy doing the rappelling was supposedly the expert they were going to rely on to get them through, I wonder if anyone thought it might not be a great idea that their 'expert' be taking the early risks.
my guess is the canyon is not as difficult as they made it to be.... after all that’s what film crews do, make it look overly incredible. I also am assuming the rest of the team has equal experience canyoneering that just cant be a one man show.
If plan A, B, C, etc doesn't plan out next summer for the boys and myself, this probably ranks around plan S. Stay tuned for our TR... some day... maybe! ;) :lol:

User avatar
BurnsideBob
Posts: 539
Joined: May 6th, 2014, 3:15 pm
Location: Mount Angel, Oregon

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by BurnsideBob » February 8th, 2016, 10:48 pm

From the USFS WO re Commercial Filming Fee Proposal:
The proposal does not apply to news coverage, gathering information for a news program or documentary. However, if a project falls outside of that scope and the filming is intended to be on wilderness land, additional criteria are applied to protect wilderness values. In that case, a permit must be applied for and granted before any photography is permitted.
Quote from: http://www.fs.fed.us/news/releases/us-f ... commercial

So if OPB's Valhalla episode is considered a documentary they are OK?

Also not sure if the above referenced statement is the last official word on the subject.
I keep making protein shakes but they always turn out like margaritas.

User avatar
adamschneider
Posts: 3717
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: SE Portland
Contact:

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by adamschneider » February 8th, 2016, 11:59 pm

BurnsideBob wrote:So if OPB's Valhalla episode is considered a documentary they are OK?
I'm guessing that's exactly how they get around the fee/permit issue. OPB is officially a non-commercial educational station, and a registered nonprofit organization.

So IF they kept their helicopters above 2500' and their group size below 12, they may have been fully within the letter of the law.

User avatar
aiwetir
Posts: 603
Joined: December 10th, 2014, 11:54 am
Contact:

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by aiwetir » February 9th, 2016, 12:26 am

Koda wrote:my guess is the canyon is not as difficult as they made it to be.... after all that’s what film crews do, make it look overly incredible. I also am assuming the rest of the team has equal experience canyoneering that just cant be a one man show.
I'm fairly certain if I were taking a bunch of people, expensive camera equipment, rigging etc, into completely unknown territory, I'd have brought a drill and a bolt or two just in case it meant dying stranded in a canyon or not, a few extra long ropes that I could abandon there, a satellite phone, an epirb, some chewing gum and a shoelace or two. While sinking a bolt in a rock in a place where very few people have gone, if it were me, I think I'd prefer desecration to death.

Based on the choice to rap down the top waterfall though, I'm not sure everyone's head is screwed on right so...
- Michael

User avatar
kepPNW
Posts: 6411
Joined: June 21st, 2012, 9:55 am
Location: Salmon Creek

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by kepPNW » February 9th, 2016, 6:39 am

Koda wrote:
aiwetir wrote:That is true, but rappelling down the top waterfall for the hell if it wasn't necessary. There were people standing at the bottom filming the act, they got there by another route either hiked, scrambled, or rappelled and not down the stream of the top waterfall.
Well, what’s "necessary" is an opinion by who was there... and certainly not a bad idea if its well within ones expertise. My guess is the camera crew could have rappeled first or was lowered... I don’t see why the star of the show had to go first. But maybe your right there was an easier way in then filming the rappel would be more boasting than anything. I just don’t know though, I wasn’t there.
I think they as much as said it was a scramble down to the base, but the "star" was able to offer the dramatic entry for the show, so he did.
Karl
Back on the trail, again...

Webfoot
Posts: 1765
Joined: November 25th, 2015, 11:06 am
Location: Troutdale

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by Webfoot » February 9th, 2016, 6:55 am

kepPNW wrote: This aspect has been bothering me the most. Those idiots spoke with great awe and reverence of their experience, but acted like drunken frat boys in the canyon. And the waterfall thing was, yeah, just silly.
I just watched this program and I don't know what people are getting upset about. How exactly were they "acting like drunken frat boys?" Why are people saying it was silly or stupid for Jarred to rap the large falls before the canyoneering began? No one would have been relying on him at that point even if he were the only canyoneer, which it seemed clear he wasn't (e.g. SAR/WEMT Mike Williams and "expert climb rigger" Brian French), as the canyoneering hadn't started yet. If something had gone wrong they would have gone back up the way they came down.

User avatar
kepPNW
Posts: 6411
Joined: June 21st, 2012, 9:55 am
Location: Salmon Creek

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by kepPNW » February 9th, 2016, 7:02 am

Okay, I'll respond, since you quoted me...
Webfoot wrote:
kepPNW wrote:This aspect has been bothering me the most. Those idiots spoke with great awe and reverence of their experience, but acted like drunken frat boys in the canyon. And the waterfall thing was, yeah, just silly.
I just watched this program and I don't know what people are getting upset about. How exactly were they "acting like drunken frat boys?"
A) I'm not upset, but won't speak for others. B) The whooping and hollering and "Vaaaallll-haaaaalllllll-aaaaa!!!!" is just the sort of thing a lot of folks are trying to get away from in the wilderness.
Webfoot wrote:Why are people saying it was silly or stupid for Jarred to rap the large falls before the canyoneering began?
No idea. But it was just pure showmanship and entirely unnecessary other than for promotional purposes.
Karl
Back on the trail, again...

User avatar
retired jerry
Posts: 14425
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by retired jerry » February 9th, 2016, 7:11 am

They succeeded in getting the episode to go viral. Reported all over the place.

I chuckle at names like Valhalla and rapelling over falls, but whatever...

No reason to get all negative about it, but that's what's to be expected on the internets :)

User avatar
kepPNW
Posts: 6411
Joined: June 21st, 2012, 9:55 am
Location: Salmon Creek

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by kepPNW » February 9th, 2016, 7:13 am

retired jerry wrote:They succeeded in getting the episode to go viral. Reported all over the place.

I chuckle at names like Valhalla and rapelling over falls, but whatever...

No reason to get all negative about it, but that's what's to be expected on the internets :)
Absolutely. :)
Karl
Back on the trail, again...

Webfoot
Posts: 1765
Joined: November 25th, 2015, 11:06 am
Location: Troutdale

Re: Valhalla: Amazing Geological Wonder Discovered in Oregon

Post by Webfoot » February 9th, 2016, 7:21 am

kepPNW wrote:B) The whooping and hollering and "Vaaaallll-haaaaalllllll-aaaaa!!!!" is just the sort of thing a lot of folks are trying to get away from in the wilderness.
And what of the ones who are glad to be in the wilderness where they can whoop, holler, or howl at the moon without anyone around to hear or care? Not every part of Wilderness Areas are crowded all the time.
kepPNW wrote:But it was just pure showmanship and entirely unnecessary other than for promotional purposes.
Stepping foot into the wilderness, heck every darn hike, is "entirely unnecessary" from a starkly utilitarian perspective. He had fun doing it; most canyoneers probably have fun doing what they do or they wouldn't go. People shouldn't appear to be having fun when they are in a Wilderness Area?

Isn't Oregon Field Guide promotional by nature?

I thought someone might be complaining about the rocks and moss that were disturbed in the course of their passage, but not this.

Post Reply