Oregon Hikers

Started messing with Lidar DEMs in school last week and it occurred to me that there are a lot of popular places with crappy topo maps out there. Saddle Mountain, Multnomah Falls and the one to the west of that. So I threw this together tonight. I even traced out the trail because you can clearly see it in the bare earth hill shading. Lidar is a magic tree eraser. Anyway here's one map, I'll throw some together next week after finals. Will take requests, may compile them onto one site if people show any interest.

Oh, hey, regular disclaimer, don't go walking off a cliff because you are using my map.

Nice map, thanks, that came out really good

I'm curious - where can you find public LIDAR data?

RobFromRedland wrote:I'm curious - where can you find public LIDAR data?

https://gis.dogami.oregon.gov/lidarviewer/

It's a little unintuitive, but you have to have the Downloadable Lidar Data layer on, click on a layer and then dig into the menu sometimes.

aiwetir > Nice map.

RobFromRedland > Washington also has a Dogami style viewer now.

http://lidarportal.dnr.wa.gov/

Peabody wrote:aiwetir > Nice map.

RobFromRedland > Washington also has a Dogami style viewer now.

http://lidarportal.dnr.wa.gov/

I meant to link to that too

How are you producing these contour lines? Could the process be scaled to large areas? I ask because it would be nice to have high resolution contour lines in OSM products, like those available from https://www.openandromaps.org/ which I use for primary navigation.

Webfoot wrote:How are you producing these contour lines? Could the process be scaled to large areas? I ask because it would be nice to have high resolution contour lines in OSM products, like those available from https://www.openandromaps.org/ which I use for primary navigation.

I built these in QGIS, a gis application (which is free btw). I too have been searching for about 3 years for a high quality topos. I thought MapBox was the OSM solution, but they stopped updating regularly and I see stuff getting close to 6 months old in MapBox now. I'm taking a web mapping course next term and will be inquiring about methods to do this, starting small and seeing if I can slowly scale up without breaking the web server bank.

It's one of the reasons I went back to school, there are so many ways to have good maps now, but no one has quite put it all together yet in the way I envision it 'should' be (good topography, frequent OSM data updates, vector graphics, local storage, storage for personal geospatial data). That product is probably a lifetime of work to produce, but maybe if I can do it small scale, someone can scale it up for me or buy my ideas.

But specifically it probably is quite scalable, it uses gdal and a simple command .

You would then have to convert the shp file into something the server could deliver and the device could read.


In the mean time, I'm going to keep playing with these tools and try to make some nice usable maps. I'll add more features to this one too. I did it in just a few minutes just to see how it looked.

interesting subject, thanks

why do you need frequent updates?

retired jerry wrote:interesting subject, thanks

why do you need frequent updates?

Because I can

That's most of the reason, but I've done so much mapping on OpenStreetMap that it's nice to see the changes appear by the time I want to use them. There are a lot of inaccuracies on old USFS maps and because we can update maps, more temporary things (business listings) are starting to show up (food carts at JRO) that maybe need to be removed then they are gone/changed. So the updating process is more important with OSM. Google controls their maps, they make an update, it shows up worldwide. OSM data is downloaded and presented by many companies who want to customize its appearance and features, these end up getting stale in many places.