That is exactly why I never embed my Flikr photos, all the links that accompany it. This is very good newsWaffle Stomper wrote:I didn't realize we could post without the link back. Had to test it for myself.
Huh? Just edit them out. It's incredibly straight-forward.BrianEdwards wrote:That is exactly why I never embed my Flikr photos, all the links that accompany it. This is very good newsWaffle Stomper wrote:I didn't realize we could post without the link back. Had to test it for myself.
Karl, remember not everyone has that much time on their hands. Editing those links out on a smart phone is very time consuming, and can be quite a hassle at times. On a PC its a synch.kepPNW wrote:Huh? Just edit them out. It's incredibly straight-forward.
Ooooh! Hellyeah, totally different story on a smartphone! I think I've made exactly one post here that had a photo using my phone. It's not a stretch to say I owe much of my career to a real keyboard and readily available cut/paste tools! A touch screen makes an extremely poor HID in many/most cases.BrianEdwards wrote:Karl, remember not everyone has that much time on their hands. Editing those links out on a smart phone is very time consuming, and can be quite a hassle at times. On a PC its a synch.kepPNW wrote:Huh? Just edit them out. It's incredibly straight-forward.
Gotta do this Flickr test myself..So... Made me look. Has something actually changed? I don't see anyway to grab the direct link, other than editing the BBCode offering(s)?BrianEdwards wrote:Cool
If you right-click on a flickr photo you get a little pop-up for the various sizes of the photo that are available. Choose one. On the next page you can right-click the photo and choose "copy image URL" or "copy image address" (the language varies from browser to browser). Now you have the direct photo link.kepPNW wrote:I don't see anyway to grab the direct link, other than editing the BBCode offering(s)?
