Bug Repellent Research...

Use this forum to post links to news stories from other websites - ones that other hikers might find interesting. This is not intended for original material or anecdotal information. You can reply to any news stories posted, but do not start a new thread without a link to a specific news story.
Post Reply
User avatar
markesc
Posts: 1530
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Bug Repellent Research...

Post by markesc » August 16th, 2009, 11:53 pm

Looks like some progress is being made!!! ... but we'll I'll have to continue my DEET showers for now.... :(

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 080309.php

"The buzz on an amazing new mosquito repellent: Will it fly?

WASHINGTON, Aug. 16, 2009 — After searching for more than 50 years, scientists finally have discovered a number of new mosquito repellents that beat DEET, the gold standard for warding off those pesky, sometimes disease-carrying insects. The stuff seems like a dream come true. It makes mosquitoes buzz off three times longer than DEET, the active ingredient in many of today's bug repellents. It does not have the unpleasant odor of DEET. And it does not cause DEET's sticky-skin sensation.

But there's a fly in the ointment: The odds may be stacked against any of the new repellents finding a place on store shelves this year or next — or ever.

Ulrich Bernier, Ph.D., lead researcher for the repellent study, said the costly, time-consuming pre-market testing and approval process is a hurdle that will delay availability of the repellents, which were discovered last year. The results of his team's work were presented today at the 238th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS) by Maia Tsikoli, Ph.D., a post-doctoral researcher working with Bernier.

"Commercial availability of topical repellents can take years and a significant investment to achieve that end goal," Bernier said. "The cost will be several hundred thousand dollars. Once you determine that the repellent works through some screening process, we then have to go through a toxicological hazard evaluation involving numerous toxicological tests."

Provided the repellents continue to work well when tested in the laboratory on human skin, and if they pass the battery of toxicological tests, they would still face a series of tests to prove their effectiveness in making mosquitoes bug off, Bernier said.

"Clearly, the odds are stacked against new repellent products making it to market," he noted.

Bernier and his team discovered the repellents with what they say is the first successful application of a computer model using the molecular structures of more than 30,000 chemical compounds tested as repellents over the last 60 years. Using 11 known compounds, they synthesized 23 new ones. Of those, 10 gave about 40 days protection, compared to 17.5 days for DEET, when a soaked cloth was worn by a human volunteer. When applied to the skin, however, DEET lasts about five hours.

Bernier routinely participates in repellency studies, which involve about 500 mosquitoes trying to land on his arm and bite through a repellent-soaked cloth. "If the mosquitoes don't even land, we know the repellent is surely working," he explained. "If they walk around on the cloth-covered-arm, they are on the verge of being repelled. If they bite… on to the next repellent."

Overall, in addition to lasting longer than current products, including DEET, the new repellents don't have the stickiness or unpleasant smell common with today's insect sprays and liquids, said Bernier. He said that extended studies are now evaluating the effectiveness of the repellents against flies and ticks.

"This was quite an ambitious project," Bernier said. "The USDA historical archives and repellents database we used consisted of more than 30,000 chemical structures tested over the past six decades."

To search for the best repellents, the team devised software that recognized structural features of a chemical that would make it effective in keeping the bugs away. They trained it by feeding it the molecular structures of 150 known repellents. Based on this information, the program learned to identify the chemical traits of a good repellent without the chemists even having to know what those traits were. For example, the team checked out 2,000 variants of a compound found in black pepper that repels insects.

###

This study was partly supported by the Deployed War-Fighter Protection (DWFP) Research Program, funded by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Armed Forces Pest Management Board (AFPMB).

The American Chemical Society is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 154,000 members, ACS is the world's largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio. "

User avatar
anna in boots
Posts: 2122
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: In the moment

Re: Bug Repellent Research...

Post by anna in boots » August 17th, 2009, 7:52 am

markesc wrote:"Commercial availability of topical repellents can take years and a significant investment to achieve that end goal," Bernier said. "The cost will be several hundred thousand dollars. Once you determine that the repellent works through some screening process, we then have to go through a toxicological hazard evaluation involving numerous toxicological tests."
Gosh, don't ya just hate it when companies are forced to prove that their product won't destroy you, your property, the environment, or your dog? Just think of all the handy chemicals that would be available at the local grocery store if we omitted that one time-consuming step.

anna in boots
Current trip reports at All Thoughts Work™ Outdoors
http://allthoughtsworkoutdoors.wordpress.com/

raven
Posts: 1531
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Bug Repellent Research...

Post by raven » August 17th, 2009, 9:14 am

Appears to be a political comment by Bernier. The military has a huge stake in repellents and, after the Agent Orange experience, demand -- and pay for -- the necessary testing. He seems to want a free ride for speedy commercialization without having to prove either efficacy or safety.

Why did he quote a soaked-clothing time for deet? Deet has probably never been used that way, apart from experiments, even by the military, probably because exposure risks make other choices preferable -- permethrin.

User avatar
tymbom
Posts: 18
Joined: August 11th, 2009, 9:41 am

Re: Bug Repellent Research...

Post by tymbom » August 22nd, 2009, 8:15 am

DoD insect repellent system with some data regarding DEET...

If correct, I did not realized that a DEET concentration greater than 50% is no more effective.

http://www.eustis.army.mil/PDFs/DODInse ... System.pdf

raven
Posts: 1531
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Bug Repellent Research...

Post by raven » August 22nd, 2009, 12:27 pm

An important subject. I did not know about the 50% rule, either. I cannot find the supporting research on a quick search, just claims. The wording used in describing effectiveness by the military may be critical to their acceptance of the rule. I do not think the rule applies on long day hikes when mosquitos are an uncertain threat.

Consumer reports and others have shown a correlation between Deet percentage and the longevity of action, with 100% beating lesser concentrations. Others have shown or claimed a protective halo effect of Deet on adjacent skin that was missed during application. (I have often depended on that halo effect, since spreading a uniform coat of Deet is unlikely.)

The military has a time-release Deet, allowing lower doses with greater longevity, and specifies use with permethrin-treated garments, reducing the need for a halo effect.

It follows that 100% Deet may be more practical for hikers using untreated clothing, shorts and short-sleeve shirts who want to carry protection against unexpected encounters on hikes of uncertain length. To which I should add, that in my experience, with some populations of mosquitos lesser concentrations of Deet seem to fail, and 100% does not keep its effectiveness for long. (Where do the testers get their standardized mosquitos?)

User avatar
retired jerry
Posts: 14425
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Bug Repellent Research...

Post by retired jerry » August 22nd, 2009, 1:16 pm

I thought they recommended less than 50% DEET to minimize adverse skin effects

I've use permethrin on boots and gaitors to repel ticks. It's good for several months. You spray it on and let it dry before hiking. It's supposed to last a couple months.

Post Reply