Central Cascades permit changes
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
I think the Enchantments are a good comparison. No, they're not a half hour drive from Seattle but it's similar to us driving to St. Helens. There are about a bazillion times as many people living in Seattle as Bend; if anything, I would guess the central Cascades are underused compared to Alpine Lakes. The Snoqualmie trailheads are only about half an hour from Seattle and I believe are like Green Lakes-level slammed in summer, and yet the FS has not tried to slap a day use restriction there yet, at least to my knowledge. I think the point of the comparison - and this is a point we made during the objector process with the FS over the Central Cascades permits - is that it's a fallacy to assume everyone is going outdoors in a non selective way. Certain places are overcrowded, but that correlates with proximity to metro areas but also with ease of access (Green Lakes is a short hike) and with "high value" status (Green Lakes is popular on Instagram). The assumption that every person who can't get a parking space at the most desirable destination will overflow to every other trailhead, rather than waiting or coming back later, misunderstands how people behave. The FS did not show proof this was happening, and was not willing to test a much more limited restriction area and then expand what had quotas if severe overflow did occur. They took overflow as a given and used it to justify the plan were going to approve from the start.
#pnw #bestlife #bitingflies #favoriteyellowcap #neverdispleased
- adamschneider
- Posts: 3717
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:02 pm
- Location: SE Portland
- Contact:
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
The parking areas at Snoqualmie Pass are massive, because the trailheads are at the ski areas. (Obviously parking isn't the whole story, but it's certainly part of it.)
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
Well, I think it is, but your point is valid: the two areas have different demographic and transportation profiles.justpeachy wrote: ↑February 25th, 2022, 4:56 pmIs that a fair comparison to make, though? The Central Cascades has a pretty big population living very close by. The Enchantments don't, if I'm not I'm not mistaken, although I admit to not being very familiar with the area. I do know that the drive from Seattle to the Leavenworth area is four times longer than the drive from Bend to many of the Central Cascades trailheads.
On the other hand, Bosterson is right that the Instagram effect is huge: the insta-cred of a sunrise selfie at No Name Lake doesn't seem to be fungible with, say, a view of one of the mosquito-choked lakes further south on the Cascade Lakes Highway. For the FS to plan as if the two are interchangeable. . . well, you get the point.
Maybe we're on the safest ground just to stick to Bosterson's other comment: the FS plan was the most restrictive intervention they could manage to push through, even though the plan's extensive reach doesn't seem to have been based on anything more than the worst case scenario of a thought experiment.
Perhaps the FS leaders felt that this would be their only chance? Were they expecting different leadership in the USDA? Did they predict that, even if such extensive exclusions were currently unwarranted, the exclusions would become necessary if Bend continues to grow in population?
Believe it or not, I barely ever ride a mountain bike.
- retired jerry
- Posts: 14426
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
I did a few Enchantments trips in the 1970s. Very crowded then. It would be overly crowded today without doing something. Very popular area and not that big. I think permits there are a good thing.
I did the Enchantments a few years ago with a permit. Still crowded but manageable. I think they allow a lot more people than the central cascades.
I'd only grumble a little if they just restricted Green Lakes (although camping in designated sites only is sufficient in my opinion, what they did before)
I did the Enchantments a few years ago with a permit. Still crowded but manageable. I think they allow a lot more people than the central cascades.
I'd only grumble a little if they just restricted Green Lakes (although camping in designated sites only is sufficient in my opinion, what they did before)
- retired jerry
- Posts: 14426
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
https://www.wweek.com/outdoors/2022/02/ ... -for-2022/
They said that the fee would be changed
Last year - $6 for processing fee
This year - adds $1 per person
Does that violate the law that says Forest Service can not charge for entry into the wilderness?
The law says they can only charge for the amenities at a trailhead, not for entry.
Maybe it's legal to charge the $6 processing fee - that's to pay for the reservation system, not use of the national forest
They removed the per person and per day charges last summer to avoid law suits (also to make it easier for low income people?)
This is sort of like the camel sticking its nose under the tent
They said that the fee would be changed
Last year - $6 for processing fee
This year - adds $1 per person
Does that violate the law that says Forest Service can not charge for entry into the wilderness?
The law says they can only charge for the amenities at a trailhead, not for entry.
Maybe it's legal to charge the $6 processing fee - that's to pay for the reservation system, not use of the national forest
They removed the per person and per day charges last summer to avoid law suits (also to make it easier for low income people?)
This is sort of like the camel sticking its nose under the tent
- retired jerry
- Posts: 14426
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
I just noticed that Olympic National Park lifted it's quota for all backpacking in the National Park. That was just a covid policy.
It's now only quota at a few busy areas like High Divide and the Grand Valley - I think we're now at the end of the end of the covid crisis - now it will be more of a background problem (unless there's another variant and another surge )
That would make more sense in the Central Cascades - quota in just busy areas like Green Lakes and Obsidian
It's now only quota at a few busy areas like High Divide and the Grand Valley - I think we're now at the end of the end of the covid crisis - now it will be more of a background problem (unless there's another variant and another surge )
That would make more sense in the Central Cascades - quota in just busy areas like Green Lakes and Obsidian
- adamschneider
- Posts: 3717
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:02 pm
- Location: SE Portland
- Contact:
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
The $1 per person is for the day use permits. Overnight permits are a $6 flat fee per group, up to 12 people.retired jerry wrote: ↑February 27th, 2022, 8:38 amLast year - $6 for processing fee
This year - adds $1 per person
Does that violate the law that says Forest Service can not charge for entry into the wilderness?
- retired jerry
- Posts: 14426
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
okay, maybe I mis-read the WW article or they mis reported it
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
I'm wondering what proof a permit holder is expected to present on the trail if asked to provide it by an authorized enforcement officer. This information seems to be impossible to find. I tried and came up empty.
Is it cell phone access to rec.gov to show the issued permit? Is it paper? Is a stored image displayed on an offline phone sufficient?
Is it cell phone access to rec.gov to show the issued permit? Is it paper? Is a stored image displayed on an offline phone sufficient?
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: May 14th, 2020, 6:35 am
- Location: Portland
Re: Central Cascades permit changes
I'm also wondering, if there is a fine and if so, how much? This is such a large area, and enforcement costs money, so I'm willing to bet enforcement will be low, except for at the overly populated areas.
Jerry, didn't you say that you saw maybe one person last year(?)?
Jerry, didn't you say that you saw maybe one person last year(?)?