Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Use this forum to post links to news stories from other websites - ones that other hikers might find interesting. This is not intended for original material or anecdotal information. You can reply to any news stories posted, but do not start a new thread without a link to a specific news story.
Post Reply
justpeachy
Posts: 3067
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by justpeachy » December 22nd, 2016, 12:03 pm

http://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/loc ... /95532938/

This is good news for fire lookouts and other existing buildings in wilderness areas, although it won't change the fact that there is often no funding, resources, or political will to preserve these structures. The crumbling Sandy River Guard Station comes to mind...

User avatar
vibramhead
Posts: 810
Joined: November 15th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: SW Portland

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by vibramhead » December 22nd, 2016, 1:11 pm

Good news indeed! With all the genuine threats that wilderness faces, I'm mystified that some groups want to make a federal case out of a few rustic log shelters.
Time spent hiking will not be deducted from your life.

GPS tracks on Wikiloc.

User avatar
miah66
Posts: 2039
Joined: July 6th, 2009, 8:00 pm

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by miah66 » December 22nd, 2016, 3:33 pm

vibramhead wrote:Good news indeed! With all the genuine threats that wilderness faces, I'm mystified that some groups want to make a federal case out of a few rustic log shelters.
Agreed! They have a cow about an old structure that is falling down, yet don't seem to mind when it's threatened by logging, privatization, grazing, mining, etc. And I don't mean theoretically threatened, but ACTUALLY threatened. It could happen as soon as Jan 21st.
"The top...is not the top" - Mile...Mile & a Half

Instagram @pdxstrider

User avatar
BigBear
Posts: 1836
Joined: October 1st, 2009, 11:54 am

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by BigBear » December 23rd, 2016, 9:49 am

I agree with those who have weighed in already. Certain structures were grandfathered into the Wilderness Act, and thus should be maintained.

It is important to know which outdoor groups represent your values and not to contribute based on the sound of their name. I do recall one group with a wilderness-like name that was actually composed of timber companies that favored strip logging. In another instance, a Montana/Wyoming-based group advocated the removal of all trail junction signage in wilderness per the "minimal impact of man" clause in the Act.

User avatar
retired jerry
Posts: 14417
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by retired jerry » December 23rd, 2016, 10:03 am

outdoor groups that submit lawsuits for every timber sale bug me too

we should have a better over-all plan for which places would be appropriate to log, and which not

we use lumber, some people's jobs depend on logging, some logging is probably sustainable

and, not popular here, but just because a hiking trail goes through an area doesn't mean it shouldn't be logged. Like approach portions of trails. As long as they fix it up afterwards. It would be an opportunity to put up informational signs about sustainable logging and it's economic effect. And use some of the proceeds to construct trails, access roads,...

There was a show on PBS about Grizzlies. They analyzed DNA and stuff. Determined that they need connected wilderness in Yellowstone, Glacier, and up into Canada in order to have a sustainable population.

That's what we should do for all plants and animals, focusing on "indicator species". Flowing down from that we can make decisions about what land to log and how to do it.

Webfoot
Posts: 1763
Joined: November 25th, 2015, 11:06 am
Location: Troutdale

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by Webfoot » December 23rd, 2016, 7:00 pm

retired jerry wrote:There was a show on PBS about Grizzlies. They analyzed DNA and stuff. Determined that they need connected wilderness in Yellowstone, Glacier, and up into Canada in order to have a sustainable population.
I think this is the one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI8ppBPqfRY

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/nature/wild-ways.html

User avatar
retired jerry
Posts: 14417
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by retired jerry » December 24th, 2016, 5:35 am

yeah, that was it, Nova

one thing interesting was to get wildlife between Yellowstone and northern Idaho wildernesses, the wildlife had to cross a highway and some ranches

the ranchers were fairly cooperative. If they did things like leave gates open when their animals were done grazing in a pasture, then wildlife could get through easier. They're pretty good at probing around and finding a route through.

Webfoot
Posts: 1763
Joined: November 25th, 2015, 11:06 am
Location: Troutdale

Re: Judge dismisses lawsuit over wilderness shelters

Post by Webfoot » December 24th, 2016, 10:12 am

That show really opened my eyes to the fact that wildlife "islands" do not an ecosystem make.

Post Reply