Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

This forum is used to share your experiences out on the trails.
User avatar
chiefWright
Posts: 101
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 5:30 am
Location: Marquam
Contact:

Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by chiefWright » March 19th, 2017, 8:35 pm

With a clear day forecast and no other commitments, my BHFF and I opted to repeat (mostly) drm’s 10 Mar trek thru Catherine/Coyote. What a difference nine days makes. I am pleased to report:

1) You’ll be very hard pressed to find just one grass widow. The grass widows are now outnumbered only by the hordes of wetsiders starved for sun and a dry place to walk. Note to Scott Cook: You need a new maximum setting on your obscurometer for all things Catherine/Coyote.
2) You’ll still be very hard pressed to find a dry place to walk for awhile. Catherine/Coyote is doing what it frequently does in the springtime. With not much flow for most of the year and thin to non-existent soil, all water is happy to flow down any convenient channel. And since most trails in the area originated with zero thought to drainage, most trails are very convenient channels.

If you like them ultralight Goretex trail runners, I hope you don’t mind ruining them. Full leather boots fitted by a pro are still my footwear of choice. And if you get wet, well, it probably won’t kill you.

OK, our route: Starting from Catherine TH, up Rowland Wall (Rowland Ridge?) trail to the connector, then the short jog east to Sunflower Hill trail (all CA2, per Burdoin/Coyote/Catherine Rec. Plan map) to Atwood Rd. Labyrinth creek (I'm making up the name-- is there an official one?) is still flowing like mad under the new and welcome footbridge. West on Atwood to the Burns Farm. We opted against the Old Ranch Road (CO3) to reach Coyote and continued on "Atwood". (explanation in quotes later..)

Along "Atwood", we first encountered a pair of NFS boundary stakes. And a bit further is a gate with a “No Trespassing” sign facing the opposite direction to keep up the ambiguity whether that stretch of Atwood is really public access or not. A bit further along we came to the junction with Cook road next to the vineyard.

I checked out the Klickitat County GIS, and found a copy of the Green Trails Columbia East maps after the hike. Looks like the county has designated this stretch as "B&B road" and it is marked as a private road, crossing both Burns Farm & Barton properties. Green Trails still calls it Atwood Rd, though it does show it crossing private lands. Oh, and Green Trails also has added yet more names to the same trails just for fun.

I’m guessing the county just wants all these pesky recreationists to go away and drink beer in the Bingen bars. One of these days I must bring along some really good wine and cheese for the folks at Burns Farm and thank them for their forbearance.

Anyway, a friendly landowner at the vineyard assured us the stretch of Atwood west of Cook really is a public road. Not that you'd want to drive on it. Turned on to the Coyote Wall trail (CO1) back on NFS land to the Great Big Ponderosa at the summit, where we were buzz-bombed by a squadron of turkey vultures while we ate lunch.

Thence down the Crybaby / Agony section of Coyote Wall trail, meeting ever increasing hordes of hikers, bikers and dogs (oh my!) travelling in all directions, many neophytes wandering asking questions about which track went where. There was a fine signpost at the Burns Farm indicating the top of Old Ranch Road Trail, and further down another signpost indicating the Traverse Trail to the wall, but just a blank post in the ground at the Coyote wall-end of the Traverse Trail. Fortunately, there’s a good signpost at the junction of Old Ranch Road and Coyote Wall Trails, and the top of Little Maui and Little Moab too. And even more wandering and questioning neophytes here as well, dodging the many bikers whizzzing by, and many dogs sniffing each others butts. A regular cacophany of outdoor lovers indeed.

One look over to the Locke Lake parking area said it all. Cars spilling all over Courtney Rd and Hwy 14, and one of the county’s finest writing tickets like mad.

Well, onward down the first leg of Little Maui (CO5). We left the trail at the 1st switchback and took a shortcut over to the Labyrinth trail (CO7, Hidden Valley). Interestingly no tire or boot treads here, just hoofprints. Very glad the poison oak is not yet extant. Labyrinth creek has receded a bit, drm's submerged plank crossing is now high (well, 2 inches high) and dry.

Found the barely evident junction of lower Labyrinth (CO7) and upper Labyrinth (CO8). There's an iddy biddy stake in the ground in the crotch of the junction. Continued on CO7 / Lower Labyrinth / Rowland Basin / Shoestring / Loose Lucy (I’m sure NFS has designated with another name & number). Not sure I’ve ever hiked in an area with so many trails with so many names. So very many trails. So very many names.

Watched a couple of high-speed cyclists completely ignore the trail closure sign when we got to the junction of CO1. Guess they don’t care much for nesting peregrines. Otherwise, CO7 was the lightest trafficked section of the day, and quite pretty.

Ascended the gap in Rowland wall back to CA2 thence to Catherine TH where yet another of the county’s finest was hard at work raising county revenue. I’m so very glad we got to the car park before 8 AM.

Some pretty pix just because without pix it never happened:
IMG_20170319_081021527.jpg
pretty morning
IMG_20170319_130434384.jpg
pretty mountain
IMG_20170319_133500600_HDR.jpg
pretty flowers
IMG_20170319_133021403.jpg
pretty rocks
IMG_20170319_132202729.jpg
pretty water

User avatar
gratefultrails
Posts: 82
Joined: October 21st, 2015, 8:08 am
Location: Eugene

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by gratefultrails » March 21st, 2017, 11:19 am

I hear you about the crowds. As soon as someone posts on the Facebook page about flowers in the Gorge, the spot is immediately descended upon by the hordes

User avatar
markesc
Posts: 1530
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by markesc » March 21st, 2017, 4:08 pm

gratefultrails wrote:I hear you about the crowds. As soon as someone posts on the Facebook page about flowers in the Gorge, the spot is immediately descended upon by the hordes
Which is why I gave up on facecrook in 2012, stay home on weekends, and rarely post any landscapes on here anymore... boo hoo right, but online posts are sort of like litter, just takes one person, then others follow, then it becomes a dump, just like the gorge hoards. I'll stick to bird photography, which is hardly location specific and much more challenging/rewarding.

User avatar
chiefWright
Posts: 101
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 5:30 am
Location: Marquam
Contact:

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by chiefWright » March 21st, 2017, 7:02 pm

markesc wrote:
gratefultrails wrote:I hear you about the crowds. As soon as someone posts on the Facebook page about flowers in the Gorge, the spot is immediately descended upon by the hordes
Which is why I gave up on facecrook in 2012, stay home on weekends, and rarely post any landscapes on here anymore... boo hoo right, but online posts are sort of like litter, just takes one person, then others follow, then it becomes a dump, just like the gorge hoards. I'll stick to bird photography, which is hardly location specific and much more challenging/rewarding.
Urgh, you almost make me feel guilty for posting!

Yes, it's very true that so many former secret spots are far from secret any more, and it is an endless debate whether to reveal them, but I tend to come down on Scott Cook's side of the fence. Secret sites are ever in danger of being revealed, but are also in danger of being closed off. As long as we all support such fine orgs as TKO, WTA, FOTG, etc., tread lightly, respect the rules and encourage others to do so also, and stay in the conversation.

Besides, there's still plenty of wilderness out there. Designated or not. Or whether it fits our sometimes narrow perception of wilderness or not.

User avatar
drm
Posts: 6154
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Location: The Dalles, OR
Contact:

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by drm » March 21st, 2017, 7:35 pm

In this case I think the relatively recent government purchase of the land as well as the current slow but ongoing implementation of the recreation plan approved by the Forest Service a few years ago is the driving force behind the growing popularity of the area. Of course the weather and the flowers and so on have been there, and mountain bikers know the area is ridable when Post Canyon is too muddy, but many commercial guidebooks have started including this area. As more trail signage goes in that is only going to increase. But it's really only a month or two a year that it is truly crowded.

User avatar
Guy
Posts: 3333
Joined: May 10th, 2009, 4:42 pm
Location: The Foothills of Mt Hood
Contact:

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by Guy » March 21st, 2017, 8:41 pm

markesc wrote: Which is why I gave up on facecrook in 2012, stay home on weekends, and rarely post any landscapes on here anymore... boo hoo right, but online posts are sort of like litter, just takes one person, then others follow, then it becomes a dump, just like the gorge hoards.
WOW, to each is own I guess! Good luck with the bird photography I'll stick with the weekend litterscapes because that's what I enjoy ;)
hiking log & photos.
Ad monte summa aut mors

User avatar
gratefultrails
Posts: 82
Joined: October 21st, 2015, 8:08 am
Location: Eugene

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by gratefultrails » March 21st, 2017, 9:00 pm

chiefWright wrote:
markesc wrote:
gratefultrails wrote:I hear you about the crowds. As soon as someone posts on the Facebook page about flowers in the Gorge, the spot is immediately descended upon by the hordes
Which is why I gave up on facecrook in 2012, stay home on weekends, and rarely post any landscapes on here anymore... boo hoo right, but online posts are sort of like litter, just takes one person, then others follow, then it becomes a dump, just like the gorge hoards. I'll stick to bird photography, which is hardly location specific and much more challenging/rewarding.
Urgh, you almost make me feel guilty for posting!

Yes, it's very true that so many former secret spots are far from secret any more, and it is an endless debate whether to reveal them, but I tend to come down on Scott Cook's side of the fence. Secret sites are ever in danger of being revealed, but are also in danger of being closed off. As long as we all support such fine orgs as TKO, WTA, FOTG, etc., tread lightly, respect the rules and encourage others to do so also, and stay in the conversation.

Besides, there's still plenty of wilderness out there. Designated or not. Or whether it fits our sometimes narrow perception of wilderness or not.
I apologize, that wasn't my intention to make you feel guilty. I think I'm a little biased from my last hike out there, where I witnessed lots of disrespect for rare ecosystems. But like you've said, we as hikers are in it together to protect public land and wilderness

User avatar
chiefWright
Posts: 101
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 5:30 am
Location: Marquam
Contact:

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by chiefWright » March 22nd, 2017, 11:50 am

markesc, no apology needed, but certainly acknowledged, thank you! "Almost guilty" is still guilt-free ;) . And I totally get your viewpoint.

Agreed, drm, there's been a lot of circumstances to "perfect storm" Catherine/Coyote into the latest hotspot of the gorge. I do miss the good old days of showing up at the Catherine parking lot mid-day on an April saturday with only a few other cars. Them days are long gone.

Pity the county's finest are busy writing traffic tickets instead of patrolling the trails for insensitive hikers. I know, I know, there's neither the legal statute, jurisdiction, or even whether that's really the right thing to do, but geeze, so many people, such a fragile area!

User avatar
adamschneider
Posts: 3717
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: SE Portland
Contact:

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by adamschneider » March 22nd, 2017, 12:29 pm

chiefWright wrote:Pity the county's finest are busy writing traffic tickets
What were they writing tickets for? What defines "illegally parked" in that neighborhood?

User avatar
chiefWright
Posts: 101
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 5:30 am
Location: Marquam
Contact:

Re: Catherine/Coyote, 19 Mar 2017

Post by chiefWright » March 22nd, 2017, 1:07 pm

adamschneider wrote:
chiefWright wrote:Pity the county's finest are busy writing traffic tickets
What were they writing tickets for? What defines "illegally parked" in that neighborhood?
Good questions-- I'm assuming they were ticketing, I didn't ask. A lot of cars were parked partially into the traffic lane.

Post Reply