The top search result was a BBC article from just two days ago with the same title, The Lost Art of Getting Lost. Strange coincidences like this coming up in my life a few times a year, like this post where I wondered about goats on Mount Hood and then days later Billri9685 posted a shot of one. (I'm lucky like that).
From the BBC article:
andI have misgivings about what we forfeit by never being lost.
I think it is important to distinguish between getting lost in a way that isn't life threatening and getting lost atop Mississippi Head in a blizzard. I'm referring to the former here:Discovery used to mean going out and coming across stuff - now it seems to mean turning inwards and gazing at screens. We've become reliant on machines to help us get around, so much so that it's changing the way we behave, particularly among younger people who have no experience of a time before GPS.
What do people who have only known a world of GPS-in-your-pocket think about getting lost? Do they ever daydream about it and wonder what might happen if they went out without their phone and got lost downtown or in some 100-acre wood?
Even having a phone/GPS with us and not looking at it, does that change potential positive outcomes of getting lost? Do we pay attention to landmarks less (even though we tell ourselves we won't) and diminish our mapping-in-our-brain skills?
Related thought: Does having a phone/GPS make us less bored in certain circumstances and change our thoughts when it might be better to be bored?
I haven't been bored at all lately and maybe I'm escaping to a fantasy world where that happens. I'd really like to know what people think about these types of things.